Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-03-16T08:37:32Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu> writes:
> So, either it is broken, or doing a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE rather than just
> VACUUM ANALYZE made all the difference.  Is this possible (the latter,
> we know the former is possible...)?

If your FSM parameters in postgresql.conf are too small, then plain
vacuums might have failed to keep up with the available free space,
leading to a situation where vacuum full is essential.  Did you happen
to notice whether the vacuum full shrunk the database's disk footprint
noticeably?

			regards, tom lane