Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-03-16T08:37:32Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu> writes: > So, either it is broken, or doing a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE rather than just > VACUUM ANALYZE made all the difference. Is this possible (the latter, > we know the former is possible...)? If your FSM parameters in postgresql.conf are too small, then plain vacuums might have failed to keep up with the available free space, leading to a situation where vacuum full is essential. Did you happen to notice whether the vacuum full shrunk the database's disk footprint noticeably? regards, tom lane