Re: Open items
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-10-28T04:32:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > We only have a few open items left. Can we finish them so we can move > toward final release? Okay, here's my two cents: > Allow superuser (dba?) the ability to turn off foreign key checks/all > constraints/triggers, not settable from postgresql.conf? We have seen a wide variety of proposals and opinions on this, ranging from "you can turn off the C in ACID anytime you want" to "you can suppress ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY's cross-check ... and nothing else ... but only if you are superuser, mutter the right secret password, and spin three times widdershins". I am in the "three times widdershins" camp myself. But given the lack of consensus, I think the right short-term answer is to do nothing further. We can improve this more in future releases. > Move ANALYZE before foreign key creation? "Move"? pg_dump scripts don't issue ANALYZE at all. Again, I think this is not something to be introducing at the last minute. > Rename dump GUC variable to be more generic Sure, if we can agree on a name. > Document new --describe-config postgres option Go to it. > Have gcc use -g, add --disable-debug, rename? Personally I don't like the idea of this behavior defaulting differently depending on which compiler you use. I can see the practical arguments for doing so, but it still rubs me the wrong way. Can anyone offer new arguments pro or con here? regards, tom lane