Re: Performance monitor
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-03-13T15:19:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes: >>> Small question... Will it work in console? Or it will be X only? >> >> It will be tck/tk, so I guess X only. > That's bad. tcl/tk is cross-platform; there's no reason that a tcl-coded performance monitor client couldn't run on Windows or Mac. The real problem with the ps-based implementation that Bruce is proposing is that it cannot work remotely at all, because there's no way to get the ps data from another machine (unless you're oldfashioned/foolish enough to be running a finger server that allows remote ps). This I think is the key reason why we'll ultimately want to forget about ps and go to a shared-memory-based arrangement for performance info. That could support a client/server architecture where the server is a backend process (or perhaps a not-quite-backend process, but anyway attached to shared memory) and the client is communicating with it over TCP. regards, tom lane