Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-14T14:52:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes: > That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are > ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every > third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I > have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function. Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread? regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed