Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
=?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara@mac.com> writes: >> Le 25 avr. 2017 à 01:47, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit : >> It looks like coypu is going to need manual intervention (ie, kill -9 >> on the leftover postmaster) to get unwedged :-(. That's particularly >> disturbing because it implies that ServerLoop isn't iterating at all; >> otherwise, it'd have noticed by now that the buildfarm script deleted >> its data directory out from under it. > coypu was not stuck (no buildfarm related process running), but failed to clean-up shared memory and semaphores. > I’ve done the clean-up. Huh, that's even more interesting. Looking at the code, what ServerLoop actually does when it notices that the postmaster.pid file has been removed is kill(MyProcPid, SIGQUIT); So if our hypothesis is that pselect() failed to unblock signals, then failure to quit is easily explained: the postmaster never received/acted on its own signal. But that should have left you with a running postmaster holding the shared memory and semaphores. Seems like if it is gone but it failed to remove those, somebody must've kill -9'd it ... but who? I see nothing in the buildfarm script that would. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Cope with glibc too old to have epoll_create1().
- 53b157846024 9.6.3 landed
- 82ebbeb0abfe 10.0 landed
-
Make latch.c more paranoid about child-process cases.
- fa31b6f4e969 10.0 landed
- 866452cd8b52 9.6.3 landed
-
Allow multiple bgworkers to be launched per postmaster iteration.
- aa1351f1eec4 10.0 landed
- e880df25ec35 9.6.3 landed
-
Revert "Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop."
- e615605239f6 9.6.3 landed
- 64925603c972 10.0 landed
-
Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop.
- b9515b628797 9.6.3 landed
- 81069a9efc5a 10.0 landed
-
Run the postmaster's signal handlers without SA_RESTART.
- 8939020853e6 10.0 landed
- dfa4baf91cee 9.6.3 landed
-
Fix postmaster's handling of fork failure for a bgworker process.
- dba1f310a564 9.5.7 landed
- 63f64d2824b2 9.6.3 landed
- 4fe04244b584 10.0 landed
- 436b560b86ca 9.4.12 landed
-
Partially revert commit 536d47bd9d5fce8d91929bee3128fa1d08dbcc57.
- 5041cdf2b792 10.0 landed
-
Avoid depending on non-POSIX behavior of fcntl(2).
- 3e51725b3854 10.0 landed
- f07f6b62c9a7 9.6.3 landed
- ce521e50eb56 9.4.12 landed
- ad8fb69cccf4 9.2.21 landed
- 9f8be7542156 9.5.7 landed
- 899960b9fec2 9.3.17 landed
-
Remove long-obsolete catering for platforms without F_SETFD/FD_CLOEXEC.
- 536d47bd9d5f 10.0 landed