Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-17T19:31:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be > renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream > is a lot more specific than that) What I like about streamrecv is it's fairly clear which end of the connection it's supposed to be used on. I find "pg_basebackup" quite lacking from that perspective, and the same for the names above. Or are you proposing to merge the send and receive sides into one executable? regards, tom lane