Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-04-15T00:27:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > What's wrong with something like "connection not permitted" or > "connection not authorized"? The case that we're trying to cater to with the existing wording is novice DBAs, who are likely to stare at such a message and not even realize that pg_hba.conf is what they need to change. Frankly, by the time anyone is using REJECT entries they are probably advanced enough to not need much help from the error message; but what you propose is an absolute lock to increase the number of newbie questions on the lists by a large factor. regards, tom lane