Re: WIP: explain analyze with 'rows' but not timing
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-12-23T15:14:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes: > One thing I'm wondering about is that the InstrumentOptions are not > exclusive - INSTRUMENT_TIMER means 'collect timing and row counts' while > INSTRUMENT_ROWS means 'collect row counts'. Wouldn't it be better to > redefine the INSTRUMENT_TIMER so that it collects just timing info. I.e. > to get the current behaviour, you'd have to do this > instrument_options |= (INSTRUMENT_TIMER | INSTRUMENT_ROWS) > It's quite trivial change in explain.c, the problem I have with that is > that it might break extensions. I'm not especially concerned by that angle --- we make bigger API changes all the time. But you could change the name, eg instrument_options |= (INSTRUMENT_TIMING | INSTRUMENT_ROWS) and then #define INSTRUMENT_TIMER as the OR of the two real bits for backward compatibility. regards, tom lane