Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-11T20:23:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I should also make clear that I intend to start out all the contrib >> modules at version 1.0. > What happens if their contents change several times during a major > release cycle? I think it'd likely be sufficient to bump them only once per release cycle, ie, there's no need to distinguish versions that never appeared in the wild. But if we forgot and created 1.1 early in the 9.2 release cycle and 1.2 late in the cycle, there's no great harm done either. What I don't want to be doing is creating artificial version bumps with empty upgrade scripts in every release cycle --- that's make-work for us, and make-work for our users too. regards, tom lane