Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion

> > Yes, you have the crux of the issue.  I wrote it because it was the best
> > thing I could think of, but it is non-optimimal.  Because all the
> > optimal solutions seemed too slow to me, I couldn't think of a better
> > one.
> 
> Thank you, Tom and Bruce.
> This is not a good news for us :-(. In any case, is 1/disbursion the
> best estimate we can have by now, even if not optimal?

That is the best one maintained by the database.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026