Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > My guess is that the creation of the index updates the table size
> > statistics.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > However, when I see zero size, I don't know if it is accurate, or if
> > someone has added rows since the last vacuum/index creation, so I think
> > it is correct to use an index on a zero-length table if it is
> > appropriate.  If the size is 1, I will assume that number is accurate,
> > and do a sequential scan.
> > 
> > Does that make sense?
> 
> Yes. But we have to fix SeqScan for field1 = -1...

Woh, I just tried it myself, and was able to reproduce it.  I will check
into it now.  Gee, that is very strange.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026