Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc

>On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
>> > src/template/alpha_cc seems missing in 6.4.2 but does exist in current.
>> > What about 6.4_REL? I belive that file should exist in any version of
>> > source tree.
>> 
>> $ cvs log alpha_cc
>> 
>> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/template/alpha_cc,v
>> Working file: alpha_cc
>> head: 1.1
>> branch:
>> locks: strict
>> access list:
>> symbolic names:
>> keyword substitution: kv
>> total revisions: 1;     selected revisions: 1
>> description:
>> ----------------------------
>> revision 1.1
>> date: 1998/12/18 07:08:02;  author: momjian;  state: Exp;
>> etc etc...
>> 
>> There's no REL6_4 tag, therefore this file does not exist as far as
>> the 6.4.* branch is concerned.  (Same deal as with discussion of
>> vacuumdb a day or two ago.)  Bruce could've applied a REL6_4 tag to
>> the file when he created it, but did not.
>> 
>> Do we want to continue updating the REL6_4 branch for stuff like this?
>> Or is it time to declare 6.4.2 the last of that branch and press forward
>> with 6.5 beta test?
>
>Nothing new gets added to the REL6_4 branch, period.  Personally, there
>also will never be a v6.4.3, so the REL6_4 branch effectively died the day
>v6.4.2 was released...

That's fine. I'm just curious why that file once existed in 6.4,
vanished in 6.4.2, then appears in current.
--
Tatsuo Ishii