Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu (Brook Milligan)
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-01-18T04:51:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu> writes: > > pg_dump won't drop stuff before trying to create it; this makes > > dropping a single table (say) and recreating it difficult to automate > > since it is subject to error if all the stuff doesn't get dropped > > properly. The following patch causes pg_dump to emit DROP ... > > statements prior to emitting CREATE ... statements. > > I think that ought to be driven by a switch to pg_dump ... > much of the time, I would *want* pg_dump's script to fail > if there's already an existing item of the given name. > > A switch is fine. Is there any concensus as to what it should be, > since the two that come to mind (-D and -d) are both used? -c for clean. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026