Re: [HACKERS] drop before create in pg_dump

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu (Brook Milligan)
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-01-18T04:51:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>    Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu> writes:
>    > pg_dump won't drop stuff before trying to create it; this makes
>    > dropping a single table (say) and recreating it difficult to automate
>    > since it is subject to error if all the stuff doesn't get dropped
>    > properly.  The following patch causes pg_dump to emit DROP ...
>    > statements prior to emitting CREATE ... statements.
> 
>    I think that ought to be driven by a switch to pg_dump ...
>    much of the time, I would *want* pg_dump's script to fail
>    if there's already an existing item of the given name.
> 
> A switch is fine.  Is there any concensus as to what it should be,
> since the two that come to mind (-D and -d) are both used?

-c for clean.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026