Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@lan2wan.com>
Cc: Brian <signal@shreve.net>, pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-05-13T16:17:29Z
Lists: pgsql-general
> On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote: > > > Would something like this be appropriate? > > > > /usr/bin/postmaster -B 256 -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql -o -F -B 256 -S 1024 > > > > or should -B just be in their once? in the postmaster setting? > > Just once. If you pass it back to a backend from the postmaster, the > postmaster handles the allocation as shared memory buffers. Here's what > the man page for postgres says: > > -B n_buffers > If the backend is running under the postmaster, > n_buffers is the number of shared-memory buffers > that the postmaster has allocated for the backend > server processes that it starts. If the backend is > running standalone, this specifies the number of > buffers to allocate. This value defaults to 64, > and each buffer is 8k bytes. Because the buffers are shared by all postmaster backends, it is a postmaster option. If you are running standalone, you will have the postgres backend allocate its own buffers. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026