Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com>, jose@sferacarta.com, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-05-10T18:38:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Cool, item removed.

> > > > NUMERIC  without size is interpreted as NUMERIC(x,6). Why ?
> > > > Standard SQL92 says that NUMERIC without size is equivalent
> > > > to NUMERIC(1)
> >     PostgreSQL specific. Should I change it to standard?
> 
> The standard (per Date's book) is:
> 
>   NUMERIC == NUMERIC(p), where p is implementation-defined.
>   NUMERIC(p) == NUMERIC(p,0)
> 
> Date also explicitly says that:
> 
>   "The following are implementation-defined:
>   ...
>   o The default precision for NUMERIC and DECIMAL if there is no
>     declared precision
>   ..."
> 
> So where did NUMERIC(1) come from? afaict Jan should use what he feels
> are reasonable values...
> 
>                      - Tom
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> South Pasadena, California
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026