Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com>, jose@sferacarta.com, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-05-10T18:38:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Cool, item removed. > > > > NUMERIC without size is interpreted as NUMERIC(x,6). Why ? > > > > Standard SQL92 says that NUMERIC without size is equivalent > > > > to NUMERIC(1) > > PostgreSQL specific. Should I change it to standard? > > The standard (per Date's book) is: > > NUMERIC == NUMERIC(p), where p is implementation-defined. > NUMERIC(p) == NUMERIC(p,0) > > Date also explicitly says that: > > "The following are implementation-defined: > ... > o The default precision for NUMERIC and DECIMAL if there is no > declared precision > ..." > > So where did NUMERIC(1) come from? afaict Jan should use what he feels > are reasonable values... > > - Tom > > -- > Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu > South Pasadena, California > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026