Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ???

> On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Probably no reason for the transaction id.  I don't remember that being
> > used at all.
> 
> Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
> used?  If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another
> six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
> distribute postgres across multiple machines safely?  I'll need the xid
> if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
> TPM.  8^)

No, I don't recommend removing it, but just not storing it in the lock
system.  There is no need for it there.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026