Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: mgittens@gits.nl (Maurice Gittens)
Cc: dg@illustra.com, scrappy@hub.org, mgittens@david.gits.nl, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-03-22T20:00:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >That said, I have a plan in mind to get a nice performance boost for > palloc(). > >As a side effect, I will guarantee 8 byte alignment of pointers returned > >from palloc(). > > > Does this imply that more memory will be used that strictly necesary under > linux? > > With regards from Maurice. Actually, perhaps less memory, because malloc memory is not aligned on double boundaries, but this is all still just conjecture. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)