Thread

1. errors in pg_attribute.h

   Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org> — 1998-03-07T00:43:21Z

   if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
   are some 12491 that should be 1249l
   
   would this cause our alignment problem?
   somehow I doubt it..
   
   in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
   attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
   silly eh?
   
   we'll see
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] errors in pg_attribute.h

   Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org> — 1998-03-07T01:21:37Z

   I fixed this (the 1/l thing) and did a recompile but it didn't help
   our alpha problems any..
   
   Can anyone describe the way the page stuff works?
   
   On Fri, 6 March 1998, at 16:43:21, Brett McCormick wrote:
   
   > if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
   > are some 12491 that should be 1249l
   > 
   > would this cause our alignment problem?
   > somehow I doubt it..
   > 
   > in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
   > attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
   > silly eh?
   > 
   > we'll see
   
   

3. Re: [HACKERS] errors in pg_attribute.h

   Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-03-07T04:48:36Z

   > 
   > 
   > if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
   > are some 12491 that should be 1249l
   > 
   > would this cause our alignment problem?
   > somehow I doubt it..
   > 
   > in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
   > attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
   > silly eh?
   
   That is surely a bug.  Patch applied to source tree.
   
   -- 
   Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
   maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
     +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
     +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)