Thread

Re: [HACKERS] doc troubles.

Darren King <darrenk@insightdist.com> — 1998-03-03T14:56:04Z

> > > > What version of tar understands how to ungzip a .gz file?
> > > >
> > > > Is this what the 'z' flag is for?
> > >
> > >       gnu tar supports the 'z' flag to uncompress and untar at the same
> > > time...
> >
> > This sucks.  As a group that seems to not like GNU (or at least their
> > license), we require enough of their tools to compile/install postgres.
> >
> > Off to see the wizard at the gnu ftp site...
> 
> Quit whining and send in some patches :) I hacked those makefiles at the end
> of a 10 hour push to get the docs wrapped up. The best thing that could be
> said for them is that they seemed to work on my machine (and I guess on
> postgresql.org now that I think about it).

I didn't send patches since I wasn't sure if you were still working on it.

Something like "gzip -dc file.tar.gz | tar -xvf -" uncompress' it in place.
I'll play around with -C to move it around.

> Could we just replace the "tar zxf" with "uncompress ... | tar xf"? Does
> anyone else have a strong opinion on (or experience with) makefiles for the
> postgres distribution who want to help Darren get out from under the gnu
> usage??

I don't really have a problem with gnu stuff, but the machine that I put
postgres on is a development machine here for other folks too.  Also used
for the src for our product line.  I can't just go drop in a new tar or
what not...

Darren

Re: [HACKERS] doc troubles.

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> — 1998-03-03T15:53:29Z

> > > This sucks.  As a group that seems to not like GNU (or at least their
> > > license), we require enough of their tools to compile/install postgres.
> > Quit whining and send in some patches :) I hacked those makefiles at the end
> > of a 10 hour push to get the docs wrapped up. The best thing that could be
> > said for them is that they seemed to work on my machine (and I guess on
> > postgresql.org now that I think about it).
> I didn't send patches since I wasn't sure if you were still working on it.

Not until I get some ideas on what would work better on more platforms...

> Something like "gzip -dc file.tar.gz | tar -xvf -" uncompress' it in place.
> I'll play around with -C to move it around.

Well, can't "uncompress" work with gzip'd files? I recall that it can, but that
may have been on a box (Dec Alpha?) with some upgraded "uncompress" capabilities.
If it can work, then we should do something like

  uncompress -c file.tar.gz | tar xf -

to get away from any non-generic utilities. Is zcat (== uncompress -c) standard
on all machines?

btw, for generating the docs tar files I used "--exclude='*.sgml'" options on
tar. Is that gnu-specific also?

                                           - Tom

Re: [HACKERS] doc troubles.

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-03-03T16:31:00Z

> to get away from any non-generic utilities. Is zcat (== uncompress -c) standard
> on all machines?
> 
> btw, for generating the docs tar files I used "--exclude='*.sgml'" options on
> tar. Is that gnu-specific also?

Yep.  Any --X option is GNU, I think.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Re: [HACKERS] doc troubles.

Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-03-03T18:26:34Z

On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> Well, can't "uncompress" work with gzip'd files? I recall that it can, but that
> may have been on a box (Dec Alpha?) with some upgraded "uncompress" capabilities.
> If it can work, then we should do something like
> 
>   uncompress -c file.tar.gz | tar xf -

	gzip -cd will uncompress 'compressed' files, but compress can't
touch 'gzip'd files...