Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?

Michael J. Rogan <mrogan@fpelectronics.com>

From: "Michael J. Rogan" <mrogan@fpelectronics.com>
To: darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King), pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-02-28T16:52:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
darrenk

So when I do it as a select statement the plan can grow larger than 8K 
because I can run the SQL command itself.

Has the plan generation changed in the last week?  I was able to create 
another view in an earlier beta but cannot now.

Is there a way to find out the size of the plan?

Michael

> > 
> > What is the rule size for views?
> > 
> > This seems to have changed in this beta; I have a view that worked in a 
> > previous beta but fails to create.  
> > "ERROR: DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big."
> > 
> > I have about 33 column headings with a join of 5 tables.
> > 
> > I have the latest cvsup tree as of a few minutes ago.
> > Linux 2.0.30
> > pgcc compiler
> 
> The rule plan is stored as a tuple, hence for this release that limit
> is a little under 8k.
> 
> For 6.4, you will be able to use a bigger block size, therefore have
> bigger tuples and this should then work again.
> 
> Sounds like the plan internally grew (possible w/subselect stuff?!?) and
> has gone over that 8k limit.
> 
> I know it's little consolation, but as soon as I can get the variable
> block size working (actually only breaks in the create_triggers regression
> test when sorting to disk), I could post it as a patch for 6.3 as well as
> put it into the 6.4 tree.
> 
> darrenk
> 
> 

* Michael J. Rogan,  Network Administrator,   905-624-3020 *
* Mark IV Industries, F-P Electronics & I.V.H.S. Divisions *
* mrogan@fpelectronics.com                 mrogan@ivhs.com *