Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks for large objects
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: mgittens@gits.nl (Maurice Gittens)
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-02-18T15:01:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Large object I/O does not persist across transactions in my case. > But maybe there are applications which assume that it does. So > "fixing" it might break things. How about some compile time flag > which selects between the old behaviour and new behaviour? > The old behaviour could be the default. > > (The new behaviour would simply avoid fiddling with MemoryContexts at all.) > My current workaround is to reconnect to the database after some > number of transactions. Large object have been broken for quite some time. I say remove the memory context stuff and see what breaks. Can't be worse than earlier releases, and if there is a problem, it will show up for us and we can issue a patch. -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us