Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su (Vadim B. Mikheev)
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org (PostgreSQL-development)
Date: 1998-02-18T15:08:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Meskes, Michael wrote: > > > > Or we should change the declare/open behaviour in that it ignores the > > embedded SQL declare command and just sends the declare command when it > > finds an open. But then standard may say that the actual way is correct. > > It seems that OPEN is in standard and this is really bad that we havn't > OPEN statement: using DECLARE we could plan query once and then > re-use this plan many times - OPEN, FETCH-es, CLOSE; OPEN, ... > Also, we could use queries with parameters (like in SQL-funcs: $1, ...) > in DECLARE and then assign parameter' values in OPEN and execute > cursor for different values. > Isn't this what Oracle allow ? Yes, I agree we should have it, and allow cursors outside transactions with OPEN/CLOSE behavior. Added to TODO. -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us