Re: [HACKERS] Alternate locations for databases
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Lockhart)
Cc: hackers@postgresql.org (PostgreSQL-development)
Date: 1998-01-11T20:48:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Just checking to make sure this properly documented for 6.3 beta. Is it? > > > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH LOCATION = 'dbpath'; > > How much work would it be to also be able to specify an alternate > > path for a table within a database? I have some multi-Gb tables > > and am scrambling for room. If I could have the tables on separate > > disks, that'd be wonderful. > > Well, it is (almost) trivial to get the full database in a different location; > in fact I put into service an unused column in pg_database which had clearly > been defined for this purpose. Probably not so trivial for individual tables, > indices, etc. If it is not on the ToDo list, perhaps Bruce could add it? I'm > probably not going to pursue it at the moment, myself, but would be happy to > work with someone if they want to do it :) As an aside, there is _no_ > performance penalty for alternate database locations, but there might be for > distributed tables/indices since the location would need to be looked up at > least occasionally. > > -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us