Thread

  1. Re: [HACKERS] varchar() change

    Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-01-08T06:16:25Z

    > > Come to think of it, I wonder if I could have the disk copy of
    > > pg_attribute use the pg_type length, and use the pg_attribute length
    > > only when creating/updating entries?  I wonder if that is what it does
    > > already.  Looks like that may be true.
    > >
    > > Comments?
    > 
    > Is what you are trying to do related to what could be used to implement
    > other (SQL92) data types like numeric(precision,scale) where there are one
    > or two additional parameters which are assigned when a column/class/type is
    > defined and which must be available when working with column/class/type
    > instances? We probably don't want to do anything about the latter for v6.3
    > (spread pretty thin with the work we've already picked up) but I'd like to
    > do something for v6.4...
    > 
    > Oh, while I'm thinking about it, this kind of thing is probably also
    > necessary to get arrays working as expected (enforcing dimensions specified
    > in the declaration).
    
    Yes, I had the numeric in mind.
    
    -- 
    Bruce Momjian
    maillist@candle.pha.pa.us