Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Cc: brett@work.chicken.org, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-06-04T23:46:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> As far as the TCP protocol is concerned, yes. A lot of libraries that > you might want to use do not have an API that accounts for the separate > "OOB" channel within one TCP connection, so it may be difficult or > impossible to get at TCP's OOB facility from within a particular > programming environment. But that's not exactly a cross-environment > compatibility problem, it's just a missing feature in a library API. > Any two implementations that both handle OOB should be able to > communicate. Looks like we will be removing OOB in favor of a CANCEL cookie sent to the postmaster. I will work up something soon. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)