Horton

Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, hackers@postgresql.org, ssimkovi@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at
Date: 1998-04-17T04:12:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> > How about an elog(NOTICE,"...") so it runs, but they see the NOTICE
> > every time.
> 
> 	That works too...but how does something like that work from within
> a C program?  Or Perl?

I have disabled HAVING completely, and removed it from the features
list.  I think we have enough bug reports on it that allowing people to
use it is really not going to give us any additional bug-fixing
information.

We can always release a 6.3.2 patch that will enable it when we have it
working 100%.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)