Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Lockhart)
Cc: scrappy@hub.org, hackers@postgresql.org, ssimkovi@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at
Date: 1998-04-16T14:56:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > Do we disable it?
> > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
> 
> Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> questions list...

We could do a elog(NOTICE,...) and have a small patch to fix all the
issues once we have a final fix.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)