Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Lockhart)
Cc: scrappy@hub.org, hackers@postgresql.org, ssimkovi@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at
Date: 1998-04-16T14:56:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?" The > > > bugs are serious and cause crashes. > > > Do we disable it? > > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until > > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :) > > Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away" > warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature > before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the > questions list... We could do a elog(NOTICE,...) and have a small patch to fix all the issues once we have a final fix. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)