Horton

Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, hackers@postgresql.org, ssimkovi@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at
Date: 1998-04-16T14:54:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> 
> On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> 
> > > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > > Do we disable it?
> > > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
> > 
> > Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> > warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> > before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> > questions list...
> 
> 	I liked the one suggestion about having it as a compile time
> option until its fixed...

How about an elog(NOTICE,"...") so it runs, but they see the NOTICE
every time.


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)