Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Lockhart)
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-04-05T14:30:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > OK, we have most of the open items fixed. Marc, can you check on number > > 4, and Thomas, please apply your patch for item 3. We can then package > > a patch and close 6.3.*. > > > > > indexes not used that were used in 6.2(fixed) > > > memory leak in backend when run on simple queries(fixed) > > > negative sign causing problems in various areas, like float4 & shortint > > > configure assert checking is reversed > > > UNION crashes on ORDER BY or DISTINCT(already fixed in source tree) > > How do we want to package the patches? Shall we assemble the relevant > patches as we did p1-p7 for v6.2.1? There were reports of problems or > difficulties from some people regarding the 6.3->6.3.1 patch, which is > probably pretty complex. Also, there are some changes in the source > tree, like the char2-16 removal, which should not appear until v6.4. > > So, I'd recommend that we take the individual patches fixing each > problem, apply them to a clean v6.3.1, run regression tests (since those > apparently broke in v6.3.1) and then release that set of patches at one > time. I would think we are safer by releasing a new diff. The char2-16 changes are the only ones I know of that should not have been applied (by me!), so we can back them out. Just seems it is too easy to miss some part of the patch. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)