Re: build gcc warning
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-27T23:10:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2022-12-27 01:55:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> A couple of buildfarm animals are warning about that too ... but >> only a couple. > I'm a bit confused by gcc getting confused here - the condition for > sub_rteperminfos getting initialized and used are the same. Most of the time > the maybe-uninitialized logic seems to be better than this. Apparently the key phrase there is "most of the time" ;-). I see that we've had an equally "unnecessary" initialization of the sibling variable sub_rtable for a long time, so the problem's been there for some people before. I made it initialize sub_rteperminfos the same way. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Suppress uninitialized-variable warning from a61b1f748.
- adb5c32eb53e 16.0 landed