Horton

Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, PostgreSQLHackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-06T18:00:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> ...but I don't really see why that has to be done as part of this patch.
>> 
>> Because patches that reduce maintainability seldom get cleaned up after.

> I don't think you've made a convincing argument that this patch does
> that, but if you're feeling motivated to go clean this up, I'm more
> than happy to get out of the way.

Yeah, I'll take it.

			regards, tom lane