Re: Bloom index

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> The only thing that jumps out at me from the code itself is the use of
> rand() and srand() which seems unacceptable.

Yeah, (1) rand isn't a good random number generator and (2) fooling with
the main random number sequence is user-unfriendly.  If you need a
private source of random numbers you might base it on erand48 like geqo
has done.

			regards, tom lane