Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>

Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2013-01-28T18:20:16Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Now that I've written this in that email, I think I'm going to go for
> the new command. But maybe we have some precedent for objects that we
> list in pg_dump only for solving several steps dependency lookups?

Yes, pg_dump has lots of objects that might not appear in a dump.
The most recent examples are the section fence objects ...

			regards, tom lane