Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-18T15:18:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > This is certainly a workaround, just like piping the file through a > suitable sed expression would be, but conceptually, the client encoding > is a property of the file and should therefore be marked in the file. In a perfect world things would be like that, but the world is imperfect. When only one of the available encodings even pretends to have a marking convention, and even that one convention is broken, imagining that you can fix it is just a recipe for making things worse. regards, tom lane