Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> My question was what are we needing to test?  If we can do only single writes
> to the log, don't we prefer O_* to fsync, and the O_D* options over
> plain O_*?  Am I confused?

I don't think we have enough data to conclude that with any certainty.

			regards, tom lane