Thread

Commits

  1. Update documentation for snowball update

  2. Update snowball

  1. snowball release

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-05-22T12:40:44Z

    Snowball has made a release!  With a tag!
    
    I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.  (not attached 
    here, 566230 bytes, but see 
    https://github.com/petere/postgresql/commit/52a6133b58c77ada4210a96e5155cbe4da5e5583)
    
    Since we last updated our copy from their commit date 2019-06-24 and the 
    release is from 2019-10-02, the changes are pretty small and mostly 
    reformatting.  But there are three new stemmers: Basque, Catalan, Hindi.
    
    I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13. 
    Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: snowball release

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-05-22T14:11:17Z

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > Snowball has made a release!  With a tag!
    > I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.
    
    Yeah, this was on my to-do list as well.  Thanks for doing it.
    
    > I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13. 
    > Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    
    Meh, I think v14 at this point.  It looks more like new features
    than bug fixes.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: snowball release

    Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@postgrespro.ru> — 2020-05-23T08:21:46Z

    On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    
    > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > > Snowball has made a release!  With a tag!
    > > I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.
    >
    > Yeah, this was on my to-do list as well.  Thanks for doing it.
    >
    
    +1
    
    
    >
    > > I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
    > > Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    >
    > Meh, I think v14 at this point.  It looks more like new features
    > than bug fixes.
    >
    >
    I would vote for including these new languages. There is no risk to let
    people try and test them.
    
    
    >                         regards, tom lane
    >
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
    The Russian Postgres Company
    
  4. Re: snowball release

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-06-08T06:21:02Z

    On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
    > Snowball has made a release!  With a tag!
    > 
    > I have prepared a patch to update PostgreSQL's copy.  (not attached
    > here, 566230 bytes, but see
    > https://github.com/petere/postgresql/commit/52a6133b58c77ada4210a96e5155cbe4da5e5583)
    > 
    > Since we last updated our copy from their commit date 2019-06-24 and the
    > release is from 2019-10-02, the changes are pretty small and mostly
    > reformatting.  But there are three new stemmers: Basque, Catalan, Hindi.
    > 
    > I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
    > Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    
    committed to master
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: snowball release

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-06-08T14:33:05Z

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
    >> I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
    >> Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    
    > committed to master
    
    Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
    we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  6. Re: snowball release

    Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2020-06-08T14:47:01Z

    > On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > 
    > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    >> On 2020-05-22 14:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
    >>> I think some consideration could be given for including this into PG13.
    >>> Otherwise, I'll park it for PG14.
    > 
    >> committed to master
    > 
    > Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
    > we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
    
    IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
    but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
    match.  Perhaps we should though?
    
    cheers ./daniel
    
    
    
    
  7. Re: snowball release

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-06-08T15:19:25Z

    Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
    > On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    >> Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
    >> we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
    
    > IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
    > but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
    > match.  Perhaps we should though?
    
    Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
    fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample.  So I guess that's the
    minimum expectation.  Maybe we should think about having a more
    formal list in the actual Snowball section (12.6.6)?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  8. Re: snowball release

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-06-08T20:48:01Z

    On 2020-06-08 17:19, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
    >> On 8 Jun 2020, at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    >>> Hm, I don't see any documentation change in that commit --- don't
    >>> we have (at least) a list of the stemmers somewhere in the SGML docs?
    > 
    >> IIRC we refer to the Snowball site, and only have a list in the \dFd output,
    >> but that can be argued to be an example and not expected to be updated to
    >> match.  Perhaps we should though?
    > 
    > Looking in the commit logs, our past updates 7b925e127 and
    > fd582317e just updated that \dFd sample.  So I guess that's the
    > minimum expectation.
    
    done
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services