Horton

Re: Use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro everywhere?

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: "Anton A. Melnikov" <a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@yesql.se, peter@eisentraut.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2025-04-04T16:32:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments


On 2025/03/28 13:09, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> * Patch needs rebase by CFbot
> 
> Rebased the patches onto the current master and marked them as v4.

I'm not sure there's clear consensus yet on the changes in the 0001 and
0002 patches, and it might not be worth rushing them in right before
the feature freeze. So for now, I reviewed and updated only the 0003 patch,
since there seems to be agreement on that one.

I've attached the updated version. It fixes a typo and replaces
the remaining hardcoded control file name with the XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro.

How about committing the attached patch first? We can consider applying
the others later if consensus is reached.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Commits

  1. Use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro consistently for control file name.

  2. Doc: Update link to the mentioned subsection