Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Date: 2023-03-18T15:19:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.
- 29d0a77fa660 17.0 cited
-
Make test_decoding ddl.out shorter
- d6677b93c79b 17.0 landed
- c5c5832600e9 14.9 landed
- b1dc946eee3d 16.0 landed
- 3bb8b9342f8a 15.4 landed
-
Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decode
- 949ac32e1267 15.3 landed
- 8b9cbd42b61f 14.8 landed
- 4df581fa0f4b 13.11 landed
- 497f863f0598 12.15 landed
- 8de91ebf2ac1 11.20 landed
- 7fe1aa991b62 16.0 landed
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 cited
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 cited
On 3/18/23 06:35, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:13 AM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Clearly, for sequences we can't quite rely on snapshots/slots, we need >> to get the LSN to decide what changes to apply/skip from somewhere else. >> I wonder if we can just ignore the queued changes in tablesync, but I >> guess not - there can be queued increments after reading the sequence >> state, and we need to apply those. But maybe we could use the page LSN >> from the relfilenode - that should be the LSN of the last WAL record. >> >> Or maybe we could simply add pg_current_wal_insert_lsn() into the SQL we >> use to read the sequence state ... >> > > What if some Alter Sequence is performed before the copy starts and > after the copy is finished, the containing transaction rolled back? > Won't it copy something which shouldn't have been copied? > That shouldn't be possible - the alter creates a new relfilenode and it's invisible until commit. So either it gets committed (and then replicated), or it remains invisible to the SELECT during sync. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company