Re: [PATCH] Check for TupleTableSlot nullness before dereferencing
Alexander Kuznetsov <kuznetsovam@altlinux.org>
From: Alexander Kuznetsov <kuznetsovam@altlinux.org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
egori@altlinux.org, nickel@altlinux.org
Date: 2024-12-13T08:54:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello, ping. What do you think about reasoning below? Maybe we should consider proposing different patch for removing redundant check there? 09.10.2024 18:23, Alexander Kuznetsov wrote: > 03.10.2024 12:48, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> From a quick reading we can only reach there after evaluating an expression, so >> can it really be null though? This code hasn't changed all that much since >> 2009, if there was a reachable segfault on a null pointer deref I have a >> feeling we'd heard about it by now so some extra care seems warranted to ensure >> it's not a static analyzer false positive. > Thanks for your response! > It seems to me that dereferencing is possible under the following scenario: > [...] > This entire reasoning is based on the assumption that slot2 can theoretically be NULL, as there is such a check at line 968. > Is it possible that no errors have occurred because this condition has always been satisfied and is, perhaps, redundant, or maybe I'm misunderstanding something? -- Best regards, Alexander Kuznetsov