Re: spinlock support on loongarch64
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: 吴亚飞 <wuyf41619@hundsun.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-02T18:55:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fall-back-to-__sync_lock_test_and_set-2.patch (text/x-diff) patch
I wrote: > So about like this, then. After actually testing (by removing the ARM stanza on a macOS machine), it seems that placement doesn't work, because of the default definition of S_UNLOCK at the bottom of the "#if defined(__GNUC__)" stuff. Putting it inside that test works, and seems like it should be fine, since this is a GCC-ism. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Allow use of __sync_lock_test_and_set for spinlocks on any machine.
- 1c72d82c2584 16.0 landed
- c479492c04ee 13.9 landed
- a5737e765d85 15.1 landed
- a0f9be1f9266 11.18 landed
- 5ecf836e9b5e 12.13 landed
- 19cefebe71ea 10.23 landed
- 058c7b5dd4cc 14.6 landed