Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified

> What about the idea that's been floated in the past about a -- 
> extensive mode for regression testing that would (generally) only be  
> used by the build farm. That would mean others wouldn't have to  
> suffer through extremely long make check's.

> Or is there another reason not to expand the tests?

I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and
maintenance effort...

			regards, tom lane