Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-13T04:12:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Copying the statistics from the old server is on the pg_upgrade TODO > list. I have avoided it because it will add an additional requirement > that will make pg_upgrade more fragile in case of major version changes. > Does anyone have a sense of how often we change the statistics data > between major versions? I don't think pg_statistic is inherently any more stable than any other system catalog. We've whacked it around significantly just last week, which might color my perception a bit, but there are other changes on the to-do list. (For one example, see nearby complaints about estimating TOAST-related costs, which we could not fix without adding more stats data.) regards, tom lane