Re: User locks code
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-08-24T00:14:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend. The only thing this licensing setup can accomplish is to discourage people from using the userlock code; what's the value of that? Besides, anyone who actually wanted to use the userlock code would need only to write their own wrapper functions to get around the GPL license. regards, tom lane