Re: row filtering for logical replication
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On 11/23/18 8:14 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 23/11/2018 19:29, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 4:13 PM Petr Jelinek >> <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If carefully documented I see no problem with it... we already have an >>>> analogous problem with functional indexes. >>> >>> The difference is that with functional indexes you can recreate the >>> missing object and everything is okay again. With logical replication >>> recreating the object will not help. >>> >> >> In this case with logical replication you should rsync the object. That >> is the price of misunderstanding / bad use of the new feature. >> >> As usual, there are no free beer ;-) >> > > Yeah but you have to resync whole subscription, not just single table > (removing table from the publication will also not help), that's pretty > severe punishment. What if you have triggers downstream that do > calculations or logging which you can't recover by simply rebuilding > replica? I think it's better to err on the side of no data loss. > Yeah, having to resync everything because you accidentally dropped a function is quite annoying. Of course, you should notice that while testing the upgrade in a testing environment, but still ... > We could also try to figure out a way to recover from this that does not > require resync, ie perhaps we could somehow temporarily force evaluation > of the expression to have current snapshot. > That seems like huge a can of worms ... cheers -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services