Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-13T20:41:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > Can we lightly background color every other rowgroup (i.e., "greenbar")? If you know how to do that at all, let alone in a maintainable way (ie one where inserting a new function doesn't require touching the entries for the ones after), let's see it. I agree it'd be a nice solution, if we could make it work, but I don't see how. I'd been imagining instead that we could give a different background color to the first line of each group; which I don't know how to do but it at least seems plausible that a style could be attached to a <spanspec>. > I don't think having a separate Result column helps. The additional > horizontal whitespace distances all relevant context information (at least > on a wide monitor). Having the example rows mirror the Signature row seems > like an easier to consume choice. Interesting idea. I'm afraid that it would not look so great in cases where the example-plus-result overflows one line, which would inevitably happen in PDF format. Still, maybe that would be rare enough to not be a huge problem. In most places it'd be a win to not have to separately allocate example and result space. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed