Re: CLOG contention
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-05T20:20:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > Parameterised slru buffer sizes were proposed about for 8.3 and opposed by you. > I guess we all reserve the right to change our minds... When presented with new data, sure. Robert's results offer a reason to worry about this, which we did not have before now. regards, tom lane