Re: CLOG contention

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-05T20:20:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> Parameterised slru buffer sizes were proposed about for 8.3 and opposed by you.
> I guess we all reserve the right to change our minds...

When presented with new data, sure.  Robert's results offer a reason to
worry about this, which we did not have before now.

			regards, tom lane