Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-03T18:13:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK,
>> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature.

> Okay, but IIUC, waiting for it to drop out of extended support means
> we deal with it for four more years. That seems excessive.

wikipedia says that RHEL7 ends ELS as of June 2026 [1].

			regards, tom lane

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Product_life_cycle



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove obsolete unconstify()

  2. Only perform pg_strong_random init when required

  3. Remove support for OpenSSL older than 1.1.0

  4. Support SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_LOW when using LibreSSL

  5. Support disallowing SSL renegotiation when using LibreSSL

  6. Doc: Use past tense for things which happened in the past

  7. Remove support for OpenSSL 1.0.1

  8. Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0