Re: Bug in pg_describe_object
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-11T16:17:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add pg_describe_object function
- 6cc2deb86e91 9.1.0 cited
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes: > @OP: Wouldn't it be sufficient to provide such a thing for structure > objects that people are actually going to modify on a regular basis? Yeah, I still don't see the need to argue over whether the elements of an operator class are uniquely identifiable or not. regards, tom lane