Thread

1. docs and createlang patch for plperl

   Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> — 2000-02-04T01:51:12Z

   Attached is a tarball that contains:
   
   pl-perl.sgml - A start at documentation.
   	Thomas, I didn't know where this belongs. Does
   	it need to be integrated into the user manual
   	or should it stand on its own. If it needs
   	to stand alone, then all the docbook declarations
   	need to be added at the front.
   
   createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
   	to the repertoire of createlang.sh
   -- 
   Mark Hollomon
   mhh@mindspring.com
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl

   Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> — 2000-02-04T07:47:27Z

   > pl-perl.sgml - A start at documentation.
   >         Thomas, I didn't know where this belongs. Does
   >         it need to be integrated into the user manual
   >         or should it stand on its own. If it needs
   >         to stand alone, then all the docbook declarations
   >         need to be added at the front.
   
   Great. I haven't had a chance to look, but I would assume that it
   should be in the User's Guide or more likely in the Programmer's
   Guide.
   
   Thanks for the docs!! I'll add them in this weekend, if not before.
   
                       - Thomas
   
   -- 
   Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
   South Pasadena, California
   
   

3. Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl

   Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2000-02-08T16:00:34Z

   Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
   > createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
   > 	to the repertoire of createlang.sh
   
   Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?
   
   I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
   plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.
   
   			regards, tom lane
   
   

4. Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl

   Mark Hollomon <mhh@nortelnetworks.com> — 2000-02-08T18:59:35Z

   Tom Lane wrote:
   > 
   > Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
   > > createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
   > >       to the repertoire of createlang.sh
   > 
   > Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?
   > 
   > I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
   > plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.
   
   Doooh! of course. I'll post a patch tonight.
   
   I guess the docs for droplang and createlang need updating as well.
   Unless Thomas has beat me to it.
   
   -- 
   
   Mark Hollomon
   mhh@nortelnetworks.com
   
   

5. Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl

   Jan Wieck <wieck@debis.com> — 2000-02-08T19:35:30Z

   > Tom Lane wrote:
   > > 
   > > Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
   > > > createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
   > > >       to the repertoire of createlang.sh
   > > 
   > > Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?
   > > 
   > > I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
   > > plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.
   > 
   > Doooh! of course. I'll post a patch tonight.
   
   .PS
   Yes, make it a NOOP. We spent so much time building these
   languages, that noone should ever have the right to drop 'em again.
   .PE
   
   
   Jan
   
   -- 
   
   #======================================================================#
   # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
   # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
   #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #