Re: pg_freespacemap question
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-03-07T15:44:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I have another question -- why is the view showing relfilenode and >> reltablespace? I imagine it should be showing the relation Oid instead. > I guess that's because FSM keeps those info, not relation oid. Right, which is correct because free space is associated with physical files not logical relations. (TRUNCATE, CLUSTER, etc will completely change the freespace situation for a rel, but they don't change its OID.) I do agree with the comment that the column order seems nonintuitive; I'd expect database/tablespace/relfilenode/blocknumber, or possibly tablespace first. The names used for the columns could do with reconsideration. And I don't see the point of the blockid column at all. regards, tom lane